НАУКА | 8 марта 2010 | K.A. & M.D.N. |
.JPG)
Психосоциальное взаимодействие - это подход к оказанию психологической и социальной помощи на базе учреждения, подход, находящийся на пересечении психологического, субъективного и социологического. Как каждый практик, создающий собственную концепцию своей работы, автор этой статьи считает, что психосоциальное взаимодействие, о котором здесь идет речь, может быть действенным только при определенных этических и практических условиях.
Франсуа Тоскель, Фернан Делиньи, контр-трансфер, центр "Ракар", группа "Опера", Мигель Д. Норамбуэна, Феликс Гваттари
НАУКА | 1 марта 2010 | K.A. & M.D.N. |

L’animation psychosociale est une approche d’aide psychosociale, institutionnelle, située à la croisée du psychologique, du subjectif et du sociologique. Si chaque professionnel élabore dans sa pratique sa propre création conceptuelle, l’animation psychosociale dont il sera ici question ne peut être opérationnelle que si elle réunit un certain nombre de conditions éthiques et pratiques.
La première, et c’est à François Tosquelles et à Fernand Deligny que nous la devons, est celle de situer, avant toute autre considération, la relation d’aide institutionnelle et psychosociale sur un plan éthique, dans le rapport à l’autre – usager, patient psychiatrique, résidant –, dans une relation de respect, de reconnaissance et de découverte de son intrinsèque et irréductible altérité, de la valeur épistémologique et humaine de sa singularité en tant que personne.
Tosquelles, groupe Opéra, Le Racard, Miguel D. Norambuena, L’animation psychosociale
НАУКА | 1 июля 2009 | Роджер Смит |

When Darwin argued for human evolution in his book The Descent of Man (1871), he prsented a list of things other writers had claimed divide human beings from animals. This list included reason, a moral sense or conscience, language, the use of tools and fire, the possession of property, religious feelings and feelings for wonder and beauty. Darwin, of course, agreed that human beings are not completely like other animals – after all, we know a person when we see one! But his argument was that we are not completely different either: we are different in degree but not in kind. He therefore provided examples of the way animals and birds show reason, live in social groups and therefore exhibit morality, communicate with signs, show curiosity and so on. Whatever humans do, he wrote, animals also do, if in very much more elementary ways. He described, for example, the Australian bower-bird, which get its name from the fact that it decorates its nest, to show that birds perceive beauty.
Darwin, evolution, reflexivity, R.G.Collingwood, Михаил Эпштейн
НАУКА | 17 января 2009 | Роджер Смит |

What, however, makes a person a person and not some other thing, like a planet, an animal, a computer or an angel? In order to ask such questions, we need a general heading, general terms, and this is where the words ‘being human’ become useful. To think about the topic ‘being human’ puts, from the beginning, a question mark against any claim that people are, really , this or that. It leaves open for study what humans from different populations or sexes share and in what ways they differ. It encourages us to think that a central aspect of being human is to ask what being human means – to reflect on our own nature. (A number of people have thought that it is this capacity for reflection, mediated by symbol systems and making it possible to change, which makes us different from other things in the material world.) By contrast, if we said that our topic is ‘human nature’, this would presuppose, insofar as we live in a secular scientific age, that the ‘real’ basis of being human is biological. A project on ‘being human’, as opposed to a project on ‘human nature’, allows us to examine the relation between biological forms of knowledge and other forms of knowledge about people.
Дарем, being human, Enlightenment, post-colonial studies, stupidity, designer drugs
|
|